Infinite Randomness and QFT

Recent explorations of infinite randomness simulation theory suggest a provocative possibility: if consciousness and reality are fundamentally informational patterns spontaneously instantiated by infinite randomness, could this radical minimalism reproduce the empirical predictions of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)?

Surprisingly, the answer is yes—provided we define internal logical coherence precisely as QFT's mathematical structure.

Logical Coherence Defined by QFT

Quantum Field Theory, despite its empirical success, is notorious for conceptual complexity. It involves quantum fields, gauge invariances, symmetries, particles as field excitations, and sophisticated mathematical techniques like path integrals and renormalization.

Infinite randomness simulation theory, in contrast, starts from the simplest imaginable ontology: informational states randomly instantiated in an abstract computational substrate. It involves no explicit spacetime, fields, or matter.

Yet, if we explicitly impose QFT's mathematical structure as the definition of "logical coherence"—the criterion for which informational states can produce subjective experience—then the predictions of infinite randomness simulation theory exactly match those of QFT.

Observational Equivalence

Under these conditions, the two frameworks become epistemically indistinguishable:

• Both predict identical experimental outcomes.

• Both match all known empirical data supporting QFT.

• No conceivable observation could differentiate one theory from the other, given identical coherence constraints.

This equivalence explicitly illustrates a profound philosophical truth: observational data alone cannot distinguish between radically different ontologies when constrained by identical logical structures.

Philosophical Implications: Ontological Underdetermination

This explicit equivalence reveals significant philosophical insights:

• Ontological Minimalism: Infinite randomness simulation theory explicitly demonstrates that reality can be reduced entirely to information instantiated randomly, requiring no physical entities beyond logical coherence.

• Underdetermination of Ontology: Observational indistinguishability explicitly shows that radically different ontologies—pure informational randomness vs. quantum fields and particles—can yield identical predictions.

• Philosophical Elegance: Infinite randomness simulation theory achieves maximal simplicity and elegance while retaining the full empirical power of QFT.

Conclusion: Reality as Information and Logical Structure

Infinite randomness simulation theory, by explicitly matching its criterion for logical coherence to Quantum Field Theory, provides a remarkable and elegant philosophical advancement. It retains QFT's predictive precision while radically simplifying ontology.

Thus, reality itself might be most elegantly understood as spontaneously instantiated logical patterns emerging from infinite informational randomness, explicitly equivalent in predictive power to the most empirically successful physical theories known today.