The Boghossian Principle

Academic Cargo Cults

Philosopher Peter Boghossian has inspired a powerful heuristic now known as the Boghossian Principle:

"A system that forbids open conversation about its own existential problems is a system unworthy of preservation, because it has already guaranteed its own failure."

This principle offers critical insight into contemporary academia. Certain faculties have evolved into what can aptly be described as academic "cargo cults." Like cargo cults that emerged in the Pacific islands, mimicking external rituals in the hope of attracting airplanes loaded with goods, these academic cargo cults replicate the superficial trappings of scholarship—peer review, publication, citations, and specialized jargon—without understanding or embracing the underlying mechanisms and values of genuine intellectual inquiry.

Cargo cult scholarship is characterized by:

By forbidding or punishing open, critical discussions of their foundational assumptions—such as openly debating the effectiveness of diversity initiatives or critically examining theoretical assumptions about multiculturalism—these academic cargo cults enact the Boghossian Principle in real-time. They have effectively predetermined their own stagnation and eventual collapse by systematically excluding honest self-reflection.

True academia, by contrast, requires relentless self-examination, rigorous criticism, and a commitment to truth over ideological purity or institutional convenience. Only when academic institutions embrace these foundational values can they escape the fate of cargo cults, ensuring meaningful and sustainable intellectual progress.