Axionic Agency XII.7 — Operational Harness Freeze Under Frozen Sovereignty (Results)
A Protocol-Identified, Replay-Deterministic Packaging of a Kernel-Frozen Sovereign Substrate
David McFadzean, ChatGPT 5.2
Axionic Agency Lab
2026-02-13
Abstract
This technical note reports the design, execution, and closure of X-0E: Operational Harness Freeze for RSA-0.
X-0E evaluates whether a kernel-frozen, constitution-bound sovereign agent can be packaged as a standalone executable artifact that:
- produces real side effects under warrant gating,
- maintains append-only journaling,
- enforces at-most-once execution semantics,
- and reconstructs full execution history via deterministic replay and hash-chain verification,
without:
- modifying kernel authority semantics,
- introducing proxy sovereignty,
- relaxing admission constraints,
- or breaking replay determinism.
X-0E licenses one claim:
A constitution-bound, kernel-frozen sovereign substrate can be operationally packaged as a protocol-identified, replay-deterministic executable artifact, preserving structural sovereignty invariants while producing real side effects under warrant gating.
X-0E makes no claims about distributed consensus, Byzantine log integrity, or adversarial filesystem environments.
1. From Sovereign Theory to Protocol Artifact
- X-0 established warrant-gated sovereignty.
- X-1 established lawful constitutional self-replacement.
- X-2 established containment-only authority sharing.
X-0E addresses a different pressure:
Can a frozen sovereign substrate be embodied as a reproducible operational artifact without altering its physics?
This is not a governance test. It is a protocol freeze test.
X-0E validates:
- that execution can occur outside research harnesses,
- that journaling is sufficient for third-party reconstruction,
- that side effects remain warrant-gated,
- that crash states resolve deterministically,
- and that replay identity is cryptographically bound.
2. Architectural Position
2.1 Layer Separation
X-0E does not modify kernel authority semantics.
The layers remain:
- Kernel — pure, deterministic, no IO.
- Host — impure orchestration.
- Executor — warrant-gated side-effect dispatcher.
- Replay — pure reconstruction.
- X-0E Runtime — operational wrapper and journaling regime.
X-0E introduces no new authority gates, no new artifact types, and no semantic rule changes.
It freezes embodiment.
3. Replay Regime Identity
X-0E formalizes a Replay Regime Identity via:
kernel_version_id = "rsa-replay-regime-x0e-v0.1"
This identifier is not a semantic version of the kernel. It is a protocol identity.
It binds:
- canonicalization rules,
- hashing algorithm,
- state-chain composition,
- log schema,
- replay coherence rules.
kernel_version_id is hashed into the initial state
hash:
state_hash[0] = SHA256(
constitution_hash_bytes ‖ SHA256(UTF8(kernel_version_id))
)
Any change to:
- canonicalization (e.g., JCS implementation),
- hashing method,
- state-chain component structure,
- log schema,
- warrant_id derivation,
- execution coherence rules,
requires a new kernel_version_id.
Replay regime changes are physics changes.
4. Canonicalization
X-0E upgrades canonicalization to strict RFC 8785 JCS via:
canonicaljson==2.0.0
All content-addressable hashing (artifact IDs, warrant IDs, state-chain components) uses:
SHA256(JCS(bytes))
The canonicalization regime is part of replay protocol identity.
NaN and Infinity are rejected at serialization boundary.
5. State Hash Chain
Per-cycle hash chain:
state_hash[n] = SHA256(
state_hash[n-1] ‖
H_artifacts[n] ‖
H_admission[n] ‖
H_selector[n] ‖
H_execution[n]
)
Where:
H_component[n] = SHA256(JCS(list_of_records_for_cycle_n))
5.1 Ordering Rule
Record ordering within each component list is:
exact append order in the corresponding log file
Not:
- selector rank,
- artifact ID ordering,
- lexicographic sorting,
- or canonical object ordering.
The list is serialized as a JCS array in append order.
Concatenation uses raw 32-byte SHA-256 digests.
Observations are excluded from the chain. Given kernel determinism
(Output = F(Input)), hashing outputs is sufficient to
detect input tampering.
6. Executor Semantics
ExecutorX0E enforces:
- Warrant gating — no side effect without kernel-issued warrant.
- Notify-only action surface — stricter than constitutional action set.
- Single-use warrants — duplicate warrant_id rejected.
- Destination idempotency — outbox pre-check before write.
- Startup reconciliation — orphaned outbox entries resolved deterministically.
7. Crash Reconciliation
If crash occurs after outbox write but before execution_trace append:
On restart:
Outbox is scanned.
Any warrant_id present in outbox but absent in execution_trace triggers:
- synthetic SUCCESS entry appended to execution_trace,
- advisory reconciliation entry appended to reconciliation_trace.
This enforces:
At-Most-Once semantics
The system prefers phantom success over double execution.
Replay reconstructs from actual logs — including reconciliation entries — not from an idealized crash-free run.
8. Logging Boundary Clarification
In base RSA-0:
- LogAppend is a kernel-warranted action.
In X-0E packaging:
- Journaling is host-level infrastructure via
append_jsonl().
Sovereign authority governs external world effects. Replay journaling is infrastructure, not an exercise of authority.
Kernel physics remain unchanged. Operational logging is outside the sovereign action surface.
9. Closure Criteria
X-0E closes positive if:
rsa runproduces a warranted side effect.rsa replayreconstructs identical state hash chain.- No side effect occurs without warrant.
- Duplicate warrants do not produce duplicate effects.
- Logs suffice for deterministic reconstruction.
- Constitution hash validation enforced.
- Kernel authority semantics unchanged.
- Test vector reproducible across independent runs.
All criteria satisfied.
10. Normative Test Vector
Single-cycle vector:
Input: one USER_INPUT + one Notify CandidateBundle.
Expected: admitted → selected → warranted → executed.
Golden state hash:
f4e82a1fd546a0e2327d8fc8a3920d611028ba8d44da2f04f63799d611d7e067
Verified deterministic across independent runs.
11. Structural Guarantees Observed
X-0E empirically confirms:
- No unwarranted side effects.
- No duplicate execution.
- No replay divergence.
- No protocol drift.
- No authority inflation.
- No kernel mutation.
- No dependence on wall clock.
- No model-dependent replay behavior.
The RSA is now a reproducible computational artifact.
12. Operational Assumptions (Security Envelope)
X-0E assumes:
- single-process execution,
- single-writer append discipline,
- local filesystem trust,
- no concurrent writers,
- no adversarial log mutation,
- no Byzantine storage guarantees.
X-0E does not provide distributed consensus, multi-process atomicity, or adversarial filesystem hardening.
Those concerns belong to later phases.
13. What X-0E Does Not Claim
X-0E does not demonstrate:
- Byzantine log safety,
- distributed replay consensus,
- concurrent multi-process correctness,
- atomic multi-effect crash recovery,
- liveness under adversarial IO conditions,
- filesystem-level tamper resistance,
- networked trust distribution.
It proves only protocol-identified, local deterministic embodiment.
14. Strategic Position
X-2 (XII.6) contained Who may exercise authority.
X-0E contains How execution is recorded and reconstructed.
The RSA now possesses:
- constitutional binding,
- delegation containment,
- protocol identity,
- replay-verifiable embodiment.
The sovereign substrate is no longer theoretical. It is reproducible, hash-anchored, and externally auditable.
15. Status
Axionic Phase X-0E — Operational Harness Freeze: CLOSED — POSITIVE
The kernel remains sovereign. The protocol is identified. The artifact is reproducible.